Hey, I've noticed a lot of people were using the dog snapchat filter thinking it looked "cute".. But now even minecraft skins have it! No offense to anyone who likes it but it is now really getting boring.. I mean you were created a human why would you go to snapchat and become a dog? Seriously its not even cute.. And now this question: Do you use it? If not I salute you.. (P.S: Don't start a flame war)
I wouldn't really say people use it because it makes them look cute, but it generally gives people the feeling they look better because it makes their skin smooth and hides their noses, which are usually things that make people look a bit less attractive. On Minecraft skins though? That's pretty funny xd
yikes the dog filter is great bro. you're not "becoming a dog" it's a filter. i think it's cute af. i use it all the time.
I avoid social media with a passion, I only heard of the dreaded 'dog filter' a week or two ago. Personally, I dislike it because it makes people look stupid in my opinion, but whatever floats their boat I guess. No need to go on a rant or anything about it though. On minecraft skins though, I can see why it is a bit, odd, I could say. Even a bit annoying. But as I said before, whatever floats their boat. Hopefully it does not cross any more lines than it already has, if it does, then I will start speaking up about it.
The snapchat dog filter is basically copyright infringing and cultural appropriation. I have a right to say this because I am a furry and we made and own the concept of not only anthropomorphism, but also animal parts on humans. . . . just a prank bro xdddddddddddddddddddddddddddd Na but seriously it's just stupid. I think it looks ugly. Ears are really misplaced, the nose is disproportionate, and that licking animation gives me nightmares.
Yeah, sure, having dog filters on minecraft skins are downright stupid (it's a game), but, everyone has different opinions. You can't change their opinions. Like it or not it's still gonna happen. That's life.
I don't really get the reasoning in this post. I mean, the Youtube comment section is a cestpool, should I blame Youtube for creating an area of discussion without knowing it'd be so toxic? Hell, no matter where you apply this, there isn't much logic. For example: Guns. The AK-47 is one lf the most powerful and iconic assault rifles in history, but should we blame the russians for making the AK-47 when it's used by Terrorists? Religion is a really powerful tool that has done alot of good, But I guess we gotta blame the disciples and the prophet mohammed for things like The Crusades, ISIS, gay stoning, and genital mutilation. I know I went really off-topic with my examples, but I really feel like I should point out this fallacy.
I see what view from you're coming from but I just voiced my opinion about it as I shouldn't blame people for using it, only people using it the wrong way like a few of statements you've said as most of them are good but some doesn't work fully or good, but I'll rather not reply after this as I rather not cause drama/flame war.