for those who voted donald trump

Different religion equals different fucking rules and consequences. It depends on the outcome, that's all.

 

Moral of the story: Donald trump is shitty and racist and acts childish.
And we should treat Muslims the same no matter what because that is what you do if you are a decent human being... We should let everyone in because we are good people and not selfish assholes who look out for ourselves.

 

I'm a muslim ;-;

 

Ok im just gonna say this. Look at France. Let in a bunch of Muslims and immigrants and now what? There is no point on arguing that because its 100% true

 

What?

 

no feminism pls

 

Bruh, the terrorists in France were citizens of France. Has no one already said this? There is no point in arguing that because it's 100% true (iirc, lol)

 

Alright, to all those who think gun control is needed; here's a few things you need to know.

The fact of not being able to not have guns is against the constitution because it gives people the right to bare arms. Also, if we didn't have any guns, that would give the government complete power over us and they could do whatever they want and we would have no way defending ourselves ( a knife is not going to work against an army people...). Yes, you can kill folks with lots of different things. It is the exact same thing to be attacked with a pencil as it is to be attacked with a gun. The lethality of of a pencil, hammer, or knife is the same. This is iron clad logic.
Registering Stuff Means It Gets Taken Away.
Just last summer I bought a new car. I had to register it. Any day now the guv’ment will come take away my car. I know registering my gun would immediately lead to someone taking it. It is not a paranoid delusion. Just like they are going to take my car, house, and vote. All things I have registered with the government. Speaking of registering, you shouldn’t have to register to do something in the Bill Of Rights.
In fact, I say we organize ourselves and go practice our 1st Amendment Right to Assembly down at City Hall. If you’re in, let me know, and I will go register for a permit post haste. You cannot regulate anything in the Bill of Rights. The 4th, 5th, and 8th Amendments have already been regulated out of existence, but true constitutional conservatives only really need to protect the 2nd. The guv’ment can spy on you, or lock you away without trial now, but your deer rifle will protect you when the S.W.A.T. team comes.
If you outlaw arms, only outlaws with have arms.
This one is just common sense. For decades we have outlawed grenade launches and fully automatic, belt fed arms. I cannot tell you how many times I have had to face down a grenade launcher armed bandit with no machine gun to protect my own self.
If you want to regulate guns, it means you are Hitler, Pol Pot, Mao, Stalin, and another guy I saw in a Facebook picture mash-up.
Those are all the terrible folks that wanted to take away your guns. Regulating guns is the exact same as taking them away. We already discussed that earlier about my car and it’s inevitable guv’ment confiscation.
Regulating assault weapons will lead to a slippery slope of taking my deer rifle.
We have already discussed how all the outlaws have grenade launchers and machine guns. Now the guv’ment even wants to take our deer rifles. Fully automatic weapons have been tightly regulated since 1934, and it is only a matter of days before that slippery slopes down to my deer rifle! Even if you believe in regulating Nuclear Arms it will all slip, slip, slippery slide to my deer rifle. If you believe in regulating Nucler Arms on down you are Hitler.
The only thing protecting the 1st Amendment is the 2nd!!
Only my rifle can protect us from a tyrannical guv’ment. If they try to make me register to assemble, I will need my rifle to prove my point. Some think democracy and voting will protect us from a third Obama term, but I know it is my rifle. I can totally take down an M1 Abrams tank or an Apache Helicopter. I got skills. The NRA knows we don’t need any of those other Amendments like the 4th,5th, or 8th. Just the 2nd baby!
The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun!
The Sandy Hook tragedy would have been stopped if only there had been a good guy with a gun. His mother was a law abiding citizen who had lots and lots of guns. Some would think that she was a “good guy with a gun, or lots of them”, but she wasn’t a guy. I think the NRA policy says it has to be a good guy with a gun.
And most of all, the 2nd Amendment protects your right to own a gun!!
You cannot regulate a right. We’ve talked about that. Even though the Amendment has “well regulated” right in the description, I believe that was an autocorrect quill error.

Also, why should hillary be president? She couldn't even handle secretary of state

Note: I'm not rooting for Donald to win etiher, I'm a Ben Carson kind of guy.

 

Some of these replies are bigger than Trump's speeches...and probably better. I wouldn't know because I am not one that reads politics on a Minecraft forum.

 

Yes my point.... By letting people into your country they then become Citizens! Thought you would realize that ._.

 

Becoming a citizen takes multiple years in countries like the US. It takes 5 years in France, specifically. You don't just go in and become a citizen. Thought you would realize that ._.

 

Ben Carson is an idiot. Anyways, gun control is needed, because we've been shown time and time again that they have been abused one too many times. Guns need to be harder to obtain, in order to have a safer community. Gun control stops the shooters from having a gun in the first place.

 

Yes I know that? France has been letting in these people for years but they weren't born in france. Also they let in refugees from syria who ended up being terroist.

 

Let's analyze how the refugee crisis started in the first place. As we know, Turkey, Greece, Hungary and Italy are taking the brunt of the refugees. However, gulf countries such as Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar etc. accepted no refugees. Their claim is that "they don't want the ISIS to see them as weak because they accepted refugees." The worst part is that it is legal for them to deny refugees. If they had accepted the refugees, Europe wouldn't have such a crisis, and Paris may not have happened. I have friends in Europe who are extremely pissed at the inflow of refugees, one of them even got to the point where he said he would beat up any more Muslims coming into UK.

 

So your saying if they let in the terrorist they wouldn't be attacking them..... What?

 

No, what I was saying, if the gulf countries had accepted some of the refugees, the situation in Europe wouldn't be as bad.

 

Right but then the Gulf Countries would also have problems.....

 

Would you rather have the Gulf Countries deny refugees, only to have half of them die on their passage to Europe, or have them accept refugees, and deal with less drastic problems?